🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a increasing number of nations are moving toward comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". The policy may be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an similar ban remains "a potential measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged the legislature to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged parents to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a advisory motion supporting a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it warns of the "compulsive" design of these services, the step does not create binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a good starting point," stated one parliamentarian driving the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by conclusive data".

Last year, momentum built behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the government vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have expressed warnings. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a girl who died after being exposed to harmful platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to design products and services that are safe and age appropriate for young users," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, action is primarily happening at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has passed a law banning under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed laws demanding adult authorization for teenagers to open social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from some politicians to copy Australia's example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Views

Beyond the West, other countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global bodies take a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even backfire". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this global debate unfolds, the policies of this nation and its followers show that policymakers internationally are no longer willing to delay for platforms to make changes on their own.